Two Items on Hypereutrophication

March 11, 2015

This interview of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s director Alan Girard hits close to home because I live only 40 minutes from this important estuary. Much concern has been raised due to Governor Hogan’s easing of regulations addressing nutrient runoff into the Bay. However, what mainly caught my attention was how Girard singled out the use of manure fertilization as a very significant source of nutrient pollution into the bay. Traditionally, organic fertilizers (like manure) were regarded more “environmentally friendly” because they released their nutrients more slowly. This has important implications for the organic farming industry. Girard believes this problem could be managed by taking into account the slope of the hill where the fertilizer is to be applied. According to this other article, hypereutrophication is not the only adverse consequence of nutrient pollution. Excess nutrients also reduce the biodiversity of forest creeks because they speed up the decomposition of leaf litter that supports these ecosystems. Worse yet, the organisms that rely on a year round supply of forest debris play an important role in removing these excess nutrients from water column. This is comparable to the positive feedback loop taking place in the Chesapeake; whereby the hypereutrophication that diminishes the oyster population further exacerbates the problem due to their role in filtering phytoplankton. When I worked in the shrimp farming industry, we tried combining shrimp with oysters. We "seeded" oysters in both the reservoir and in the shrimp ponds. The oysters in the relatively clear water of the reservoir grew far better than those we placed in the hypereutrophic shrimp ponds. I know that hypereutrophication kills oysters due to anoxia, but we assiduously managed these ponds to prevent algae crashes, so I do not believe that anoxia played a role. If the oysters in the ponds were not “choking” on too much algae, their poor growth might also be attributed to the nutrient content of this algae population. Any thoughts on this from someone who is more qualified?


 

Correlation Between Personality and Terrain Preference

March 4, 2015

I like both mountains and ocean shores, but if I have to choose one I prefer the ocean. A new study implies that introverts prefer mountains and extraverts prefer the seaside. Apparently this preference is related to the likelihood of socializing in the given environment since mountains are regarded as more “secluded” (this probably rules out skiing resorts). I am not an introvert, but I do prefer secluded beaches because of their natural beauty, especially if there are s...


Continue reading...
 

More on the Ethanol Racket

March 1, 2015
This article about the European Union's Ban on First Generation Biofuels contains two videos that succinctly describe the damage of the ethanol racket on the environment and politics. According to the first video the mandate was started by George W. Bush, but Obama pretty much ran with it. The second video describes how congressman Charles Grassley goes after an oil company that chooses not want to sell E-85 (an crappy product that almost nobody wants due to its low energy density and destruc...
Continue reading...
 

The Ethanol Mandate Versus Reality

February 26, 2015

Grain prices are dramatically lower due to high yields and lower demand for ethanol fuel. I have never been a fan of setting aside land to grow biofuels, and I have always regarded the ethanol mandate (for putting ethanol in gasoline) as a particularly egregious example of politicians implementing bad policies just to buy votes. While I feel for tenant farmers struggling to pay the rent, they partly have themselves to blame for their participation in this charade. 


Continue reading...
 

Reverse Desertification: A Win-Win Means of Carbon Sequestration

February 21, 2015
Reversing the process of desertification is a winner on many levels, not only because it provides more arable land, but also because it absorbs carbon from the atmosphere, addresses one of the greatest concerns of climate change (the growth of deserts in lower latitudes), and increases biodiversity. With most forms of geoengineering there are too many unknown consequences, and with emission reductions we know more about the dire economic consequences than the ecological advantages. Hence, mor...
Continue reading...
 

The Brave New World of Geoengineering

February 16, 2015

Without a major technological breakthrough, no country will sacrifice its economy to reduce its carbon emissions in a large way. Hence, nothing short of a world government along the lines of that in North Korea can make this happen now, and most people (like myself) prefer to take chances with global warming than live like the North Koreans. Consequently, some environmentalist prescribe geoengineering as a means to offset anthropogenic climate change. This article cautions ag...


Continue reading...
 

For Environmentalists Who Like Long Showers

February 11, 2015
Like most Americans, I appreciate the relaxation that comes with a warm shower. But as an environmentalist I am mindful of how much water and energy this consumes. I somethings thought about designing a means for recirculating water in a shower after the dirty water has gone down the drain. This shower designed in Sweden has taken this idea a step farther by means of instant purification as well as recirculation, thereby saving a whooping 90% of the water otherwise consumed. The only thing mi...
Continue reading...
 

The Cost-Effectiveness of Vaccination

February 6, 2015

While on the topic of my activity using the WHO database, I will relate this to the recent measles outbreak in the U.S. Based on this article, “herd immunity” kicks in at about 92-94%. Shockingly, some counties of California have immunization rates is as low as 18-23%. Evidently, some people in these counties feel they can “afford” to refuse vaccination because of their access to first rate medical care in the event that their children are stricken. This is not the ca...


Continue reading...
 

Alleviating Poverty by Eliminating the Use of Solid Fuels in the Home

February 4, 2015

This article highlights the cost-effectiveness of subsidizing modern stoves (such as gas or electric) in order to phase out solid fuels like firewood and dung. The devastating effect of indoor pollution from solid fuels has been thoroughly documented by the WHO.  In one of my lab activities (2-5: Risk Factors and Health Outcomes in Africa) students compile raw data from the WHO interactive website. This culminates in a graph with solid fuel use on the x-axis and childhood dea...


Continue reading...
 

Most Radioactive Places on Earth

February 2, 2015
This easy to understand video puts radioactive exposure in perspective by measuring it in terms of "bananas" (the radiation contained in a banana due to its potassium content). Much like the chart I referred to in an earlier post, this video puts many concerns to rest with regards to routine exposure like cordless phones and microwave ovens. I was particularly shocked at the amount of radiation absorbed by smokers. Would this be the main reason smoking causes lung cancer?
Continue reading...
 

About this blog

This blog was originally created in January 2013 to serve as a means for providing updates on science activities from the environmental science lab manual Ecology, Development, and Sustainability. I have now expanded its purpose to include other items of interest to science teachers. 

Make a free website with Yola